Book of the week: M. Kaku. Hyperspace
Powered by MaxBlogPress 

117. Recent lattice QCD simulations – how good is QCD in the infrared?

Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF                                


A very interesting paper on lattice QCD spectroscopy by the European collaboration (DESY, Marceille, Wuppertal, Julich) is published in the recent issue of Science.The authors were able to reproduce the mass scales of light hadrons which coincide with measured ones up to 1% precision (take a look at the Table 1 in the paper). It means that a) QCD does describe the low energy physics perfectly, i.e., we don’t need corrections to the QCD Lagrangian at energies lower than the scale of \Lambda_{QCD} and b) lattice QCD has reached the stage of development when all systematic error effects are under control. No more, no less.

Here are some technical notes:

  1. Heroes of the day (or better say month?) were able to calculate the fermion determinant for u-, d- and s-quarks. Effects of charm, bottom and top quarks were included in the light quark masses and the coupling.
  2. They were able to track fields in the volume large enough in order for finite volume effects to be negligible. Namely, they had M_\pi{}L>4.
  3. They performed calculations for larger m_{u,d} using chiral perturbation theory and extrapolated to  the physical point by Taylor expansion.
  4. The lattice scale they used was of the order a\approx0.125 fm (of course, they also performed simulations or other couplings in order to recover the continuum limit). Note that this lattice spacing is just 10 times larger than the characteristic size of a light hadron. Nevertheless, it is enough to derive masses with 1% deviation from the observed values.

So, my message to you, graduate students, is as follows :-) Do not waste your precious time thinking how to modify QCD largrangian in the IR, instead, try to quantitatively understand QCD at low energies, or at least gluodynamics – it’s already a good starting point to get your Nobel Prize, since infrared dynamics of QCD is currently the most important problem in contemporary theoretical physics ;-)

As people say, current mood – extremely enlightened.

Via Marco Frasca.

  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

If you liked the post, please kindly consider to leave a comment, subscribe to the RSS feed or get new posts sent directly to your Inbox. If you want to chat with me in real time, you can find me on Twitter. The posts below are probably related to the subject of this one:

118. Last two weeks of November on NEQNET
112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales
124. Talk in Munich. Regularizing correlators of curvature perturbation
111. Talk in Munich. One interesting infrared scale in inflationary cosmology
287. Heavy quark thermalization in classical lattice gauge theory

RSS feed | Trackback URI

2 Comments »

Comment by Ervin
2008-11-29 18:43:00

Dear Dmitry,

Is your message that we now fully understand the theory behind infrared QCD? Are you saying that lattice QCD is a good-enough computational tool and theorists should not spend any further effort in understanding the physics of infrared QCD?

Best regards,

Ervin

Comment by Dmitry
2008-11-29 21:54:18

Dear Ervin

No, what I want to say is that QCD is the theory correctly describing not only UV physics of strong interactions (k\gg \Lambda_QCD) but IR physics as well, i.e., it is not necessary to change the QCD Lagrangian at scales k\ll \Lambda_QCD, as lattice QCD simulations show.

However, theoretical understanding of IR behavior of QCD is essentially absent at this point.

Cheers,
Dmitry.

 
 
Please, enter your name (required)
e-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
or login via Facebook by clicking the button below
Your comment (smaller size | larger size)
For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

« Back to text comment
or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post