NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

117. Recent lattice QCD simulations – how good is QCD in the infrared?

HEP-TH/PH — By Dmitry Podolsky on November 29, 2008 at 1:00 pm
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

A very interesting paper on lattice QCD spectroscopy by the European collaboration (DESY, Marceille, Wuppertal, Julich) is published in the recent issue of Science.The authors were able to reproduce the mass scales of light hadrons which coincide with measured ones up to 1% precision (take a look at the Table 1 in the paper). It means that a) QCD does describe the low energy physics perfectly, i.e., we don’t need corrections to the QCD Lagrangian at energies lower than the scale of 117. Recent lattice QCD simulations   how good is QCD in the infrared? and b) lattice QCD has reached the stage of development when all systematic error effects are under control. No more, no less.

Here are some technical notes:

  1. Heroes of the day (or better say month?) were able to calculate the fermion determinant for u-, d- and s-quarks. Effects of charm, bottom and top quarks were included in the light quark masses and the coupling.
  2. They were able to track fields in the volume large enough in order for finite volume effects to be negligible. Namely, they had 117. Recent lattice QCD simulations   how good is QCD in the infrared?.
  3. They performed calculations for larger 117. Recent lattice QCD simulations   how good is QCD in the infrared? using chiral perturbation theory and extrapolated to  the physical point by Taylor expansion.
  4. The lattice scale they used was of the order 117. Recent lattice QCD simulations   how good is QCD in the infrared? fm (of course, they also performed simulations or other couplings in order to recover the continuum limit). Note that this lattice spacing is just 10 times larger than the characteristic size of a light hadron. Nevertheless, it is enough to derive masses with 1% deviation from the observed values.

So, my message to you, graduate students, is as follows 117. Recent lattice QCD simulations   how good is QCD in the infrared? Do not waste your precious time thinking how to modify QCD largrangian in the IR, instead, try to quantitatively understand QCD at low energies, or at least gluodynamics – it’s already a good starting point to get your Nobel Prize, since infrared dynamics of QCD is currently the most important problem in contemporary theoretical physics 117. Recent lattice QCD simulations   how good is QCD in the infrared?

As people say, current mood – extremely enlightened.

Via Marco Frasca.

2 Comments

  1. Ervin says:
    November 29, 2008 at 6:43 pm

    Dear Dmitry,

    Is your message that we now fully understand the theory behind infrared QCD? Are you saying that lattice QCD is a good-enough computational tool and theorists should not spend any further effort in understanding the physics of infrared QCD?

    Best regards,

    Ervin

    Reply
    • Dmitry says:
      November 29, 2008 at 9:54 pm

      Dear Ervin

      No, what I want to say is that QCD is the theory correctly describing not only UV physics of strong interactions (k\gg \Lambda_QCD) but IR physics as well, i.e., it is not necessary to change the QCD Lagrangian at scales k\ll \Lambda_QCD, as lattice QCD simulations show.

      However, theoretical understanding of IR behavior of QCD is essentially absent at this point.

      Cheers,
      Dmitry.

      Reply

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.