NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics

For physicts by physicists

  • Archives
  • Best posts
  • Contact us
  • How to subscribe
  • Newcomer?
  • Open problems
  • Home
  • APPLIED
  • ASTRO
  • COND-MAT
  • HEP-TH/PH

Subscribe via email

or connect via

112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales

ASTRO, HEP-TH/PH — By Dmitry Podolsky on November 27, 2008 at 4:30 pm
Print This Post Print This Post   Save This Post as PDF

Dmitry Podolsky has got his PhD from Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics. He currently works as postdoc at Case Western Reserve University. He is also one of the editors of NEQNET.

As Instanton figured out in comments to the previous post, the scale 112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales is related to the self-reproduction scale. How to show this? Well, recall that the classical displacement of the inflaton field during one efolding is

112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales, (1)

where 112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales is the slow roll parameter. On the other hand, during the same amount of time the fluctuations of 112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales are generated with characteristic amplitude

112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales. (2)

The latter become important for the evolution of the inflaton background, when (1) becomes of the same order as (2). We have then

112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales,

which coincides with the condition for 112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales to become of the order 1, as I derived in the previous post (see the expression after Eq. (3) there). In other words, both 112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales and 112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales are given by the scale of self-reproduction.

Let me now mention two other infrared scales which are of interest for cosmologists.

First one appears if we analyze the loop expansion for the correlators of 112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales in the 112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales theory on de Sitter background. It turns out that every term in the loop expansion diverges in the infrared, and if we keep only leading IR divergences, we find

112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales. (3)

As we note, the actual small parameter of the perturbation theory is 112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales and not 112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales. Also, it seems that the expansion breaks down when

112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales,

i.e., the breakdown happens at the scale

[Unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula. Error 2 ].

This scale is quite a bit longer than the scale of self-reproduction 112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales.

What actually happens at this scale? Does the series (3) diverge or not? I will answer to this question in the next post.

Finally, analyzing loop expansion in the 112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales formalism in order to calculate corrections to the correlation functions of the curvature perturbation 112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales, we find

112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales,

where 112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales is the number of efoldings, 112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales is the power spectrum of the inflaton field, dots denote terms of higher power w.r.t. the parameter 112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales, and 112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales is some infrared scale where we need to cut the logarithm.

Experts in 112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales formalism call this scale the size of the box. What is the size of the box, is it arbitrary and if not, how can it и related to other infrared scales we discussed? Does the 112. Talk in Munich. Other two interesting infrared scales expansion diverge? This was the subject of my talk in Munich and will be the subject of a couple of the next posts.

0 Comments

You can be the first one to leave a comment.

Leave a Comment

Click here to cancel reply.


For LaTeX in your comment, please use tags [tex] and [/tex]. Also, you may use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Login with Facebook:

or subscribe me to comments RSS feed

Trackback responses to this post

Related Posts

  • No Related Post
  • Comments
  • Login
  • Search
  • Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation Large non-Gaussianity from axion inflation
    January 31, 2012 14:01
  • On strong disorder renormalization On strong disorder renormalization
    March 18, 2011 20:03
  • Relaunching NEQNET
    January 20, 2011 21:01
  • Saturday’s photoguess: what does this monkey symbolize?
    June 20, 2009 19:06
  • Dynamics of space storm
    June 19, 2009 12:06
  • Micro: Can 2 question provide a common solution? Black holes, information loss paradox and Ultra high energy cosmic rays. ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: SAGITTARIUS A* -- James Ph. Kotsybar Mysteriously cloaked, obscure despite Interior illuminating glare, Long ...
  • cad: The presentation can be found in several formats at http://pirsa.org/08110051/...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COMMENTS FOR THIS ENTRY ARE CLOSED -- James Ph. Kotsybar When the general public hears about A breakthrough in...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: FEARFUL SYMMETRY (from Songs Of Experiments) -- James Ph. Kotsybar Beyond notice, out of sight in dimensions c...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: OFF THE SCALE -- James Ph. Kotsybar The young lady known simply as Bright, who could travel at speeds f...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: COSMIC PREDICTION -- James Ph. Kotsybar Betelgeuse is gonna blow! It?s just a matter of time It?s only ten...
  • Leo: Ok I have a question: if a black hole is supermassive, say 100 billion solar mass, let's suppose Alice fells int...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: HIGHER DIMENSIONS -- James Ph. Kotsybar From point to line to plane to sphere there?s only three dimensi...
  • superkuh: I am glad you are back! No more disapointing weekly refreshings of that monkey....
  • Dmitry: Thank you James, beautiful and inspiring as usual :)...
  • Dmitry: Yes, renormalization group should still be applicable, but crit. exponents have to be different. By the way, if we ...
  • James Ph. Kotsybar: UNIQUE PARAMETERS -- James Ph. Kotsybar There is only one answer to creation. Though we don?t nearly understan...
  • Ariel Amir: Very interesting, thanks. It indeed seems to be very close to what we discuss here. I wonder whether the distributi...
  • Dmitry: Hi Ariel, thanks for the explanation! Let me now discuss a bit the application I had in mind. It has to do w...
    Register,
    login with your NEQNET profile
    or login with Facebook:

    • 226. Top ten open problems in physics
      • 33 comments
    • 353. Vortex line representation. Cauchy invariant
      • 33 comments
    • The very meaning of socialism
      • 26 comments
    • 377. Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement
      • 26 comments
    • Biocentrism: book review
      • 24 comments

Facebook: Community

Facebook: Your Friends

Google Friend Connect

Links: Journals

Links: Resources

Links: Blogs

  • Lubos Motl's Reference Frame
Copyright © NEQNET: The world of theoretical physics 2008-2011. All Rights Reserved.